If you want the best GPU right now for $400 or less, AMD's RX 5700 XT, Navi 10 and the RDNA architecture are the winner. Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG.In order to … vs. vs… We've put the reference models from both companies against each other in this head-to-heat battle. Here are the results: AMD's RX 5700 XT just about sweeps the results, coming out 7-10% faster overall at the tested resolutions. With this iteration, NVIDIA are hoping to contest AMD’s recent RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT with a better value proposition than compared to the 2060. I think in the long run their greed will bite them in the butt. If you’re looking at spending $400 on a new graphics card, then you now have two great choices (or a $499 RTX 2070 Super option if you’re willing to spend a little more to get even better performance). And you apparently didn't read the article well because they also clearly said that this is not limited to Navi, neither the problems, nor the poll, nor the driver issues were limited to Navi, but primarily many of the core issues, especially the black screens etc., are. AMD’s price cut was brilliantly timed to react to Nvidia’s Super cards, and the performance promises match up. Ryzen 9 3900X 2. The RTX 2060 Super has a TDP of 175 watts, whereas AMD’s similarly priced 5700 XT draws up to 225 watts. Frequency and quality of driver updates is a bit harder to quantify. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super: Which Graphics Card to Buy for 1440p Gaming? That doesn't mean the memory subsystems of the GPUs are the same, however. AMD recommends a minimum 600W power supply, and Nvidia recommends at least a 550W PSU. In this post, we’ll be … i've been using Radeon's since the Radeon 64 DDR. Both companies also delivered 'game ready' drivers in a timely fashion for all of the major launches, and both had a few hiccups along the way. Both cards are available for around $400, representing the lower portion of the high-end GPU market, and we're here to declare a winner. 95. 73 points. We’ve seen AMD use 7nm for the Radeon VII, but this card was based on the previous GCN architecture. GeForce RTX 2060 Super Radeon RX 5700 XT; GPU Name: TU106 (TU106-410-A1) vs: Navi 10 (Navi 10 XT) Fab Process: 12 nm: vs: 7 nm: Die Size: 445 mm²: vs: 254 mm² It's possible for custom cards to use larger coolers and better fans to get around that, but in general the Nvidia RTX 2060 Super will use less power, generate less heat and keep noise levels down. RTX 2060 Super vs. RX 5700 XT im Test | 1440p Ultra Gaming. Destiny 2 performed a lot better on both the 2060 Super and 2070 Super than AMD’s 5700 series in terms of raw frame rates, but Division 2 seems to be better optimized for AMD’s cards. That choice will probably come down to whether you value less heat, less power consumption, and a lot less noise from your PC. The problem is that so far, we'd only rate the ray tracing effects as truly desirable in Control and maybe Deliver Us the Moon—and even then the performance hit can be large. However, higher power use leads directly to more heat output, which potentially means more fan noise. It only has a 'few' more transistors,10.8 billion (that’s a half billion, but not a big difference percentage-wise), but the die size is 445 mm2. Both the RTX 2060 Super and RX 5700 XT were introduced in the summer of 2019. Today's best AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super and deals. New York, But a lot of the extras are within GeForce Experience. Unless you're folding protein strands, searching for ET, building an AI to take over the world, mining cryptocurrency or some other work, chances are good that you're looking at a graphics card upgrade to play games. Beyond a small performance bump, the most notable difference with the new NVIDIA cards is that the RTX 2060 … For most PCs, the 30-50W difference in power use isn't going to matter a lot—if your PSU can handle the 2060 Super, it should be able to handle the 5700 XT as well. Das Testsystem für diesen Vergleich basiert auf einem Intel Core i9-9900K, einem Asus ROG Strix Z390F Gaming Mainboard sowie einem 16 GB RAM Arbeitsspeicher bei 3200 MHz. The latest Nvidia 442.19 drivers don't have any major new highlights to discuss, but like AMD the company has been adding features and enhancements for years. AMD’s cards are noticeably louder than Nvidia’s equivalents, and if you value a silent PC, then I can’t recommend AMD’s cards here. The RTX 2070 ends up being 5% faster than the RTX 2060 Super, making performance mostly a tie. 95 $ 699. In the case of the 2060 Super and 5700, Nvidia’s actually well ahead, beating the $350 Radeon GPU by a 9% margin. You may not love the way ray tracing effects look in every game, or the potential performance impact, but at least you have the option to turn them on and try them out. I’ve found Battlefield V is one of the good examples of ray tracing effects, thanks to the reflections on objects and guns, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider uses ray tracing in a number of shadowy scenes. Both games also support the DirectX 11 API (we tested DX12 in Warhammer 2 on AMD GPUs, DX11 on Nvidia), where eight of the ten remaining games were tested with either the DX12 or Vulkan API. The choice between AMD and Nvidia for $399 or below has suddenly become a lot more complicated. vs. vs. 42 facts in comparison. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. Refreshed Turing takes on AMD’s fastest Navi card. EVGA 800W PSU Note that these numbers are the average frames per second across three runs where higher is better. Please refresh the page and try again. In Far Cry 5, frame rates regularly exceeded 90 fps on max settings, and the 5700 XT outperformed Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Super and came close to the higher-priced 2070 Super in most of my tests. Time Spy ran better on Nvidia’s cards. Home > Graphics card comparison > Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra. $400 is an important price point as well, as going higher up the performance ladder typically brings diminishing returns. It still costs more, but ray tracing use in games should pick up with both the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X coming later this year and supporting the feature. RX 5700 XT and RTX 2060 Super versions from the above-mentioned budget arrive with a dual or triple-fan open-air cooling system, though you may also encounter blower-cooled cards. The XT variant is 11-12% faster at 1080p and 1440p. The good news is that either GPU should easily handle 1080p ultra gaming at 60 fps, and 60 fps is even doable at 1440p ultra on many of the games—Assassin's Creed Odyssey, Borderlands 3 and Metro Exodus being three where one or both cards come up short. To put things in perspective, the driver download size currently tips the scale at 529 MB for Nvidia and 482 MB for AMD. AMD's RX 5700 XT is also the first 'real' 7nm GPU—we don't really count the Radeon VII, since it was late to the party, based around an old architecture, and overall couldn't match Nvidia's existing cards. It doesn't matter that not everyone is having issues. Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT Both cards have a recommended price of $400. Plus you have the choice between G-Sync and FreeSync / G-Sync Compatible displays. Two of the top contenders for the best graphics card right now are AMD's Radeon RX 5700 XT and Nvidia's GeForce RTX 2060 Super. I briefly tested the 2080 Super, too, and the performance gains over the regular RTX 2080 weren’t as significant as the 2060 Super and 2070 Super. As a rx 5700 user I'd definetly go for amd. Fortunately, it is backwards compatible with PCIe 3.0, so you can still use the 5700 cards with existing motherboards and CPUs. Individual GPU sales may come and go, but for the past several months at least, the RX 5700 XT has been selling for less than the RTX 2060 Super. Lower prices go a long way toward overcoming any potential feature and power advantages Nvidia might have. As it stands, AMD’s aggressive pricing makes the choices at the midrange a lot more difficult, especially as the RX 5700 and 5700 XT are now going head-to-head with Nvidia on performance. We upgrade GPU drivers more frequently than most users, and with a constant stream of new GPUs to test we're more aware of login requirements and captchas than most. This feels like an obvious mistake because the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT both run hotter and are way louder than Nvidia’s RTX competition as a result. you can always undervolt and oc navi at the same time and that improves temps and performance. AMD’s new cards are both based on the company’s 7nm process, RDNA architecture, and use 8GB of GDDR6 graphics memory. But, … NY 10036. Now, AMD is setting its sights on Nvidia’s midrange cards with its Radeon RX 5700 ($349) and RX 5700 XT ($399). There’s no support for ray tracing or promises of AI-powered anti-aliasing. Right now, there are only a small number of supported titles, and the ray tracing effects are often relatively small. Tools like MSI Afterburner and EVGA Precision X1 are readily available for those that want to tinker, and are arguably better than anything AMD or Nvidia are likely to build into their drivers. We prefer AMD's unified approach, but there's something else we like about AMD's drivers. AMD has laid some important and exciting groundwork with the move to 7nm and the RDNA architecture. This isn't an insurmountable lead, and factory overclocked cards could potentially narrow the gap, but both AMD and Nvidia partner cards are typically overclocked to similar levels so that shouldn't shake up the standings much. I was most surprised with the RTX 2070 Super performance, bringing it very close to what the standard RTX 2080 can offer. Overall, the gaming experience was much the same using either … 75 points. We measured around 325W at the outlet with the RTX 2060 Super, and 370W with the RX 5700 XT. Home > Graphics card comparison > Gigabyte Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Going by the new prices, the Radeon RX 5700 now competes with the GeForce RTX 2060, whereas the RX 5700 XT and the RTX 2060 Super fight it out in the $400 segment. AMD’s RX 5700 XT and 5700 blower spins up almost immediately into a game, and it’s distracting unless you’re using headphones. AMD's card features a Navi 10 GPU with a new RDNA architecture, while Nvidia's card is effectively a refresh of 2018's RTX 2070—the same TU106 GPU with slightly fewer CUDA cores enabled, but with a lower price that makes it the better bargain. I tested all games with a 27-inch Asus ROG Swift PG279Q monitor (G-Sync disabled) at 1440p resolution and max settings. We also didn't test with ray tracing enabled in the two games that support it, since AMD has so far elected not to add driver support for DXR. 99. Only the RTX 2060 Super Founders Edition uses a single 8-pin PEG connector. Blowers have benefits for space-constrained cases, but for everyone else, a dual- or triple-fan system will be far more efficient. While PCIe 4.0 doubles the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0, this isn’t really required at current resolutions and refresh rates, and it will become far more important in the future when resolutions push beyond 4K. The NVIDIA RTX 2060 Super brings ray tracing and DLSS 2.0 tech along with a lower TDP. Winner: AMD, because logging in to use drivers is a terrible idea. That should mean more game developers start focusing on ray tracing, as both next-gen consoles will support it. There was a problem. The RTX 2060 Super also offers entry-level ray tracing support and hardware accelerated DLSS. I ran both at maxed-out settings, and all of the cards handled well. Two days ago. Regardless, we've been hearing about all the 'amazing' ray tracing enabled games coming soon for more than a year now, and most have failed to live up to the hype. We've been data mined enough, thanks. AMD has certainly closed the performance gap in the midrange, thanks to some impressive price points, but it still has a long way to go with its reference cards to compete on heat, power consumption, and noise. AMD is using a different way to measure temperature than Nvidia, which does result in higher reported temps. The regular 5700 (non-xt) is within 3% slower performance compared to the 2060 super. It's also very useful if you're not using the RTX 2080 Ti and playing titles with ray tracing at 1080p. However, there's one thing that I've come to despise about GeForce Experience: The required login and captcha to make things work. GPU-Z as an example showed average power draws of 173.2W for the 2060 Super vs. 179.0W for the 5700 XT—even though outlet power use was 48W higher on the AMD card. Price, performance, and power usage are key at the $300 to $400 price points, and AMD is trying to find a delicate balance of all three with the RX 5700 series. Will it still be fast enough to handle all the extra effects, or will you need to upgrade to a 3060 or some other future card? © Both of AMD’s new cards also support PCIe 4.0, but you’ll need a new motherboard and AMD’s third-generation Ryzen CPUs to see the benefit from that right now. AMD's RX 5700 XT has an official Typical Board Power (TBP) rating of 225W, while Nvidia's RTX 2060 Super is rated at 175W. If ray tracing in games truly catches on—we want more games that look like Control rather than Battlefield V or Shadow of the Tomb Raider, for example—the RTX 2060 Super could be a better long-term purchase. While AMD has failed to match Nvidia in terms of performance at the high end, competition at the midrange couldn’t be closer. Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Super GPU is a refreshed version of their RTX 2060 launched just 10 months prior. We’re unlikely to see Nvidia move to 7nm this year, so AMD’s new architecture is the big new challenger for graphics cards in 2019. Still, on paper the RX 5700 XT has 9.0 TFLOPS and 448 GBps of bandwidth going up against the RTX 2060 Super's 7.2 TFLOPS and 448 GBps. DLSS works okay but it's not perfect. The only games that favored the Nvidia RTX 2060 Super are The Outer Worlds and Total War: Warhammer 2—both of which are, oddly enough, AMD promotional titles. That's nearly as large as the entirety of Windows XP, just for your GPU drivers and associated software. AMD also sweetens the deal by offering some free games with RX 5700 XT cards (you'll want to verify the deal is available from the reseller before buying, however). They're not the fastest GPUs around—or at least, Nvidia's GPU isn't the company's fastest option, as the RTX 2070 through RTX 2080 Ti are all faster—but they're two of the best overall values. We'll be refining our power testing with specialized hardware in the near future, as reading power use via software utilities depends on the drivers, but AMD and Nvidia don't report the same metrics.