Not that physical chip size really matters in a desktop PC, but Intel's competing Core X-Series chips measure about 2 inches by 1.75 inches, and the Ryzen chips are even smaller. This is one of the notable performance regressions we have encountered with Intel’s new mesh architecture. But the nimble Ryzen 7 1800X also demonstrates the value of a much less expensive platform. That likely, in part, accounts for the fact that all the Threadripper chips have high stock clock speeds. Considering there aren't a whole lot of time-consuming tasks in computing that are still limited to single computing core or thread, we're chalking AMD's showing here to "good enough." We're not arguing with the logic of that, but the fact is: 1080p is still a wildly popular gaming resolution, and one that is also favored by competitive gamers with high-refresh-rate 1080p screens. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Intel’s chip is a formidable competitor with the same two core boost clock speed of 4.5 Ghz as its 10 core i9-7900X brother. As noted up top, Threadripper as a platform is powerful and complex, but the actual chip-install process is unlike anything we've seen before in the consumer-desktop realm. … (We don't have an Epyc chip on hand to say for sure.) And compared to the current-generation 10-core Core i9-7900X, the Threadripper 1920X did about 13 percent better while selling for $200 less. The 1950X outperforms Threadripper 1920X, suggesting this title scales with additional cores. Even the roughly $320 Core i7-7700K does better than the Threadripper chips here. The result is a proprietary score indicating a PC's suitability for processor-intensive workloads. https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1920x. Companies: #amd… The 1900X has been promised to launch at the end of August 2017. All that said, remember that we were able to hit the 4GHz mark using the massive 360mm Thermaltake Floe Riing cooler we mentioned in our test-bed description. The award-winning Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X CPUs proved that AMD is serious about HEDT performance, and that disrupting the status quo still matters in the most elite PC segment. Both systems were equipped with 32GB of RAM running at 3,200MHz, using the motherboards' built-in XMP profiles. And the new 10-core and 8-core Intel Core X-Series chips bested both the Threadripper chips, despite their more numerous cores and threads. With all of this action in high-end desktop processors, 2017 may go down (in the minds of PC enthusiasts, at least) as the year of "more cores for the masses." Game Mode disables a number of cores (the amount depends on the chip) and tweaks the RAM performance to favor gaming. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review. We're still not sure how all but the most well-heeled of hardware junkies are going to use all of those lanes. That said, as soon as you start moving down the pricing ladder, the current cost of compatible motherboards becomes more of an issue. actually the view should be you cannot afford not to go this way. Long gone are the times of taking days off (literally) for "rasterizing and rendering" of work flows. RAM: 32GB (8GB x 4) G.SKILL Trident-Z RGB DDR4-3200 MHz CL14. The only issue with that approach is that you may run into games that won't launch without some cores disabled, as we did with Far Cry Primal and the Threadripper chips. In addition, for a look at the best of what AMD's and Intel's more mainstream computing platforms have to offer, we included the eight-core/16-thread AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and the four-core/eight-thread Intel Core i7-7700K. Both results again bested the Core i9-7900X's 91fps on the same test. And most recently, AMD's high-end Ryzen Threadripper platform has topped out at 32-thread capability with the $999-MSRP AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. And on the plus side (albeit superficially), the retail packaging is unusually interesting. This test was interesting for a couple of reasons. The AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper 1950X processor is designed to provide indisputable multi-processing supremacy on the X399 ultimate platform for desktop. Those numbers are about 1fps lower than what we saw when testing the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, and compare well to the Core i9-7900X, which delivered just 97fps on the same test with the same card. http://www.anandtech.com/show/11726/retesting-amd-ryzen-threadrippers-game-mode-halving-cores-for-more-performance/16, Hats-off to AMD and Intel. But this test clearly favors fewer cores and faster clocks (and less latency), as the mainstream quad-core Core i7-7700K delivered a much higher 130fps at 1080p on the same test with the same card. Cooling: Noctua NH-U14S-TR4-SP3. Intel has been churning out high-end desktop (HEDT) chips on the regular for years now. Matt is a self-described Net nerd, gadget geek, and general connoisseur of off-kilter culture. But as this is physically, by far, the biggest consumer processor in the last several years, existing coolers cover only the central portion of the chip. It's AMD to the rescue again, though, as it stands to offer 12 cores for just £799 and 16 for £999 with the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X respectively. More important is the more than 20 percent difference between the Core i7-6950X and the Threadripper 1920X. Without a stopwatch, no one is going to notice the difference between 21, 22, or 24 seconds. Napomena: Prikazani rezultati za Ryzen Threadripper 1920X … How many computing threads do you actually need? If you're one of them, your chips are here. Apple M1 8x 3.20 GHz: 0 (0%) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12x 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT: 406 (100%) Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Threadripper 1920X sports 12 fed by 38MB of cache, quad-channel memory, and 64 PCIe lanes - all for $800, compared to Intel’s $1000 Core i9-7900X. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6146: 20. You wouldn't buy a $799, $999, or even pricier CPU from Intel or AMD to do primarily that kind of thing, in any case. To see how well the stepped-down Ryzen Threadripper 1920X handles gaming, we swapped that chip into our test bed and ran the same games that we used to test other recent processors. Handbrake, a commonly used tool for converting videos from one format to another, benefits from having lots of cores and threads at your disposal. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review Today is a critically important day for AMD. Then came Intel's Core X-Series/Core i9 response at Computex 2017 in June. We ran our two test games on both our Core X-Series testbed with the Core i9 chip, and our Threadripper testbed with the Threadripper 1920X. Motherboards on the competing Intel Core X-Series platform (using the Intel X299 chipset) started at about $100 less than the lowest-cost X399 Threadripper boards at the time we wrote this in mid-August 2017. (But really, he prefers the low-tech scenery of the Scottish Highlands and the hills of Japan. The big, $999 beastie, 1950X, … Just as with the lesser Ryzen chips, when we stepped up to 4K resolution (3,840x2,160), performance evened out, with the Threadripper 1920X, 1950X, and Core i9-7900X chips all turning in frame rates of 49fps. In this test, we use a nice, big hunk of 4K video to see how the chips perform with a sustained task of this kind. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. But as much as all of us might want access to all the computing cores and threads we can get, if only for bragging rights, how many of us can actually make any substantive use of the Threadripper 1950X's 16 cores, or the upcoming Intel Core i9-7980XE's 18 cores and 36 threads? AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X review - Performance - CineBench by Hilbert Hagedoorn. Civilization VI, Battlefield 1 & Dawn of War III. (For more on that, see the chatter about Intel "Coffee Lake" at sister site ExtremeTech.). Enter the the $799-MSRP Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. Given the mostly sub-10-percent difference between the two modes, unless you're a frame-rate stickler, you may want to just leave Creator Mode enabled, especially since you need to reboot when switching between modes. Igor Wallossek Get Yours. A graduate of the first class of the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, his work has appeared in Popular Science, Consumer Reports, Smithsonian, and elsewhere in the ether. This year, first there was the eight-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 chips that made their debut in March. Back in the realm of tasks that like lots of cores and threads, AMD's Threadripper chips are back on top. What does that tell us? Even the Ryzen 3 chips delivered about 48fps here, indicating that at extreme resolutions with a high-end graphics card, the CPU generally isn't a bottleneck at all; the limitations are around the video card's ability. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Atom S1240: 22. HDD: Samsung 960 PRO M.2 NVMe. But we'll have to wait for Intel's even higher-end Core i9 chips to arrive for the Threadripper 1950X to have any real competition on tasks that gobble up cores and threads. Test: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X . Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning. Paul Alcorn, Last, we fired up the popular 7-Zip file-compression software and ran its built-in compression/decompression benchmark, which is another useful test of a CPU's multi-core abilities. That one is Intel's original 10-core consumer chip, which debuted in May of 2016 and (somehow!) For serious Enthusiasts, Prosumers and Creators, AMD designed the new 2nd Gen Ryzen™ Threadripper™ 2920X. The chip has a base clock of 3.5GHz and a top stock clock speed of 4GHz. By Jarred Walton 10 August 2017. 16 cores provide an astonishing 32 threads of simultaneous multi-processing power, while 40MB of combined cache and vast I/O from the enthusiast-grade AMD X399 platform stand ready to feed the beast. And that's to say nothing of the rumored upcoming six-core laptop processors from Intel. That said, both the Threadripper and Core i9 chips deliver high enough frame rates to satisfy all but the most discerning high-fps game junkie. Core i7-7700K also does well out of the box, managing to outpace the brawnier stock Threadripper models. We tasked the CPUs to convert a 12-minute-and-14-second 4K .MOV file (the 4K showcase short film Tears of Steel) into a 1080p MPEG-4 video…. AMD Socket AM4 Workstation AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, 1600X, 1500X MSI X370 Tomahawk 4x 8 GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 Both of AMD's current Ryzen Threadripper chips feature 512K per-core of L2 cache (8MB total on the 1950X and 6MB on the 1920X), quad-channel memory controllers (2+2), … Tags: #amd-zen #ryzen #socket-tr4 #threadripper #tr4 #x399. In fact, in these two games, the Threadripper 1950X actually performed better than the Core i9-7900X. After that, again to get a sense of how the Core i9 handles single-core performance, we ran the same benchmark using the "One CPU" setting. Using the same settings as we used for the Threadripper 1950X (that is, setting the voltage at a rather high 1.325 volts, which was expressly suggested by AMD), we were able to get the Threadripper 1920X stable with all cores clocked at 4GHz, 500MHz above the 3.5GHz base clock. But note that if you want the best possible gaming performance at or around 1080p resolution, you're better off with a chip with fewer cores and higher clocks, like the Core i7-7700K. The 180-watt TDP (thermal design power, a measurement of required heat dissipation) of the Threadripper chips is quite high, higher even than the 165-watt TDP of Intel's promised 18-core Core i9 chip. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition. And you'll need a robust cooler (preferably a self-contained liquid model, though an air cooler is an option) to keep Threadripper chilled—especially if you intend to overclock. Compare this with the upcoming 18-core Intel Core i9-7980XE, which Intel has revealed will have a low 2.6GHz base clock. And our POV-Ray "All CPUs" result went from 54 seconds at stock to 50 seconds—again, a change of about 7 percent for the better. The Asus ROG Zenith Extreme we used for testing was priced at $549. AMD Ryzen 3 3300X a Intel Core i3-10100: Test levných čtyřjader Proč jede Intel z kopce a proč není dobré se radovat 90 čtenářů navrhlo autorovi prémii: 36.2Kč Prémie tohoto článku jsou již uzavřené, děkujeme za váš zájem. That Intel "Extreme Edition" chip debuted at almost $1,000 more than the 1920X less than a year ago when we wrote this, and it's now trailing well behind not AMD's best chip, but the company's second-best Threadripper offering. Just factor in the high cost of motherboards and cooling into your build budget. Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, Also in our charts from Intel is the Core i7-6900K, a previous-generation eight-core chip that sells for around $1,000, about the same price as the top-end Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. PSU: Cooler Master V1200 Platinum . The install process is a little complex, to the point where if you aren't a veteran builder, you may want to buy a pre-built Ryzen system, or at least a bare-bones kit where the CPU comes pre-installed. Our Threadripper 1920X turned in an average frame rate of 125 frames per second (fps) in Creator Mode, and a negligible bit less (124fps) in Game Mode. With the launch of reviews and the on-sale date for its new At 1080p in this benchmark, the Threadripper 1950X system managed an average of 103fps, while the 1920X interestingly jumped up to 108fps. You save a lot of time with gear like this my two 1950X rigs are killing my workload like no tomorrow... pretty impressive...for just gaming, maybe......but then again....its a solid investment that will run a long time... Sure Billy Gates, at 1080p with an 800$ CPU and an 800$ GPU made by a competitor... sure... We check over 130 million products every day for the best prices, Civilization VI, Battlefield 1 & Dawn of War III, Grand Theft Auto V, Hitman & Shadow of Mordor, Not a Bug: Cyberpunk Deletes Idling Cars, Scared Crowds, TMSC Is Reportedly Terminating Discounts and Increasing Prices, Cyberpunk 2077 Bug Bulldozes AMD Ryzen: Here's a Fix, Tested (Updated), The Hawk Supercomputer Will Get a GPU Injection. Share this page . The less expensive Core i7-7820X and -7700K CPUs outpace AMD's Threadripper processors, though much of this is due to Ryzen's tendency to stutter during the opening seconds of our benchmark sequence. Given the already high 180-watt TDP of the Threadripper chips, we wouldn't expect to get high sustained overclocked speeds without a similar cooling solution. This was a great article. AMD Socket SP3 (TR4) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, 1920X Asis X399 ROG Zenith Extreme 4x 8 GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 Intel Socket 2066 Intel Core i9-7900X MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC. 30 August 2017. You will receive a verification email shortly. Wildly extreme 32-thread performance, for the same price as Intel's new 20-thread Core X-Series CPU. AMD provides a downloadable app, Ryzen Master, for system monitoring and overclocking, as well as toggling between AMD's so-called Creator and Game Modes, which we'll get into in a little bit. still sells for between $1,500 and $1,700. The 10-core Core i9-7900X should at least be in the same league as the Threadripper CPUs (for the most part). But on the multi-core test, the Threadripper 1920X absolutely destroys last year's Core i7-6950X—which debuted at almost twice the 1920X's $799 price! AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Review. That's at least in part because Threadripper is pretty much a straight-up consumer-focused clone of the AMD's (also new) Epyc server line. Now, how did the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X shake out versus the 1950X and the Intel competition? This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. There is, after all, a pretty big gulf between 20 threads and the Threadripper 1950X's 32 threads. AMD went out of its way in its reviewer's guide it sent along with the Threadripper chips to state "the AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor was not designed for or intended to run games at the 1,920x1,080 resolution." We stuck all those components into Mean:It's tempered-glass 5PM case, and used Thermaltake's new Floe Riing 360 RGB for CPU cooling.